An Audio Critique

An Audio Debate

Part I: The Rabbinic Sinthome and its Foundational Trauma: The First Knot

1.1 Recapitulation of the Foundational Thesis

This report’s speculative analysis is predicated on the foundational thesis presented in the document “THE KNOT OF THE LETTER: RABBINIC JUDAISM AS SINTHOME”.1 This foundational analysis argues for a radical theoretical revision: that Rabbinic Judaism is not, as Sigmund Freud posited, a “collective obsessional neurosis” 1 to be “cured” 1, but rather a highly sophisticated, non-pathological “collective… solution”.1 In the terms of late Lacanian topology, it is a collective ‘sinthome’.1

A ‘sinthome’ is a “fourth ring” that creatively knots the three registers of the psyche—the Real (‘R’), the Symbolic (‘S’), and the Imaginary (‘I’)—when the standard function of the “Name-of-the-Father” (‘Nom-du-Père’) fails.1 This foundational thesis locates this failure not in Freud’s mythic “murder of Moses” 1, but in the Real historical trauma of 70 C.E.: the Roman destruction of the Second Temple.1

This destruction is framed as a catastrophic “Symbolic failure.” The Temple, the central organizing signifier and guarantor of the psychic knot, was lost, ripping a “hole in the Symbolic order”.1 This de-knotting of the registers threatened a “collective psychosis”.1 In response, the “symbolic Rabbinic psyche” 1 invented a new knot: the ‘sinthome’ of Rabbinic Judaism. This ‘sinthome’ is a ‘savoir-faire’ (know-how) 1, a set of embodied practices that holds the collective psyche together and allows it to ex-sist.1

1.2 The Tripartite Structure of the Rabbinic Sinthome

The foundational document details the specific ‘savoir-faire’ by which the Rabbinic ‘sinthome’ knots each of the three registers 1:

1. Knotting the Symbolic (‘S’): The ‘Savoir-Faire’ of the Letter. The de-knotted Symbolic is re-knotted by the “endless hermeneutic process of Talmud and Midrash”.1 This ‘savoir-faire’ with the materiality of the signifier (‘S1’) itself, rather than a search for a final signified (‘S2’), generates an “infinite, self-sustaining Symbolic order”.1 The Rabbinic psyche “en-joys” its text 1, finding ‘jouissance’ (enjoyment) in the “superabundant vitality” 1 of endless debate. The process of interpretation, not its result, is the knot.
2. Knotting the Real (‘R’): Halakha as a Template for ‘Jouissance’. The ‘sinthome’ must manage the Real, the register of “unbearable bodily intensities” and “excess of life” that is ‘jouissance’.1 This is achieved through Halakha (Jewish Law). This is not Freudian neurotic prohibition, but a “foundational template of subjective relationships to enjoyment”.1 Halakha “channels,” “domesticates,” and “contains” the “insufferable pressure of the drives” 1, transforming “unbearable enjoyment” into a “livable practice” through meticulous ritualization of time, food, and the body.1
3. Knotting the Imaginary (‘I’): The “Jewish Cogito” as Identification with the Remnant. The ‘sinthome’ provides a stable ego-ideal via the “‘Jewish Cogito'”.1 This is not a Cartesian cogito of mastery, but an “identification with the object ‘a'” 1—the “leftover, the remnant” 1 of the Symbolic Other (God). The concept of “Chosenness,” in this model, is reframed as the Imaginary identification: “I am this non-signifier for the Other”.1

1.3 The “Diasporic Cogito” and its Inherent Passivity

The ‘sinthome’, as a functional knot, produces a durable collective ‘imago’. This is the “diasporic Jew”.2 The modern, secularized perception of this ‘imago’ is precisely the “neurotic, intellectual, urban ‘persona’ of Woody Allen”.3 This psyche is founded on text and law, not on land or physical image. Its ‘savoir-faire’ is hermeneutic, its ‘jouissance’ is textual, and its Imaginary is that of a “remnant”.1

This structure is, by definition, passive and disembodied. It is a knot designed for ‘ex-sistence’ 1 in a state of exile, or diaspora. This passivity is not a moral failure of this ‘sinthome’; it is its primary structural function and strength. It successfully channels the “destructive” 1 ‘jouissance’ of the Real away from direct physical confrontation and into the “infinite, self-sustaining” 1 Symbolic register of textual debate. It is a knot designed to avoid a confrontation with the Real, which it manages at a distance through the intricate rituals of Halakha. It is this very success, this structural passivity, that will be catastrophically invalidated by the Shoah—an event that is an assault from the Real, which no amount of textual ‘savoir-faire’ can manage.

Part II: The Rupture of the Real: The Shoah as De-Knotting

2.1 Theorizing the Shoah: A “Hole in the Real”

This analysis must precisely differentiate the topology of the two foundational traumas. The destruction of the Temple (70 C.E.) was a Symbolic failure: a “hole” where the central signifier, the ‘Nom-du-Père’, should be.1 The Rabbinic ‘sinthome’ rushed in to “fill” this void with its own infinite Symbolic (Talmud).

The Shoah is a trauma of an entirely different order. It is not a lack in the Symbolic, but a surplus in the Real. It is a “hole in the Real”.4 It is an encounter with an “unreadable ‘tuché'” (traumatic encounter) 6, an “Absolute Evil” that is “impossible to be dialectized”.7 It is the “industrialization” of sacrifice to an “Obscure God” 7, a “massacre completely excluded from sense”.7

Lacan’s own commentary, as cited in the research, confirms this. He dismissed any attempt to explain the Shoah via “hegelian-marxist dialectics”.7 It is, rather, a “return from the real of some horror”.7 This absolute, non-signifying, non-dialectical horror represents the total “collapse” and “failure” of the Symbolic order itself.6 Language, the very basis of the Rabbinic ‘sinthome’, “can only form an edge to it”.4

2.2 The Failure of the Rabbinic Sinthome

The Shoah is the event that proves the catastrophic insufficiency of the first ‘sinthome’. A knot designed to manage a Symbolic lack via text is proven useless against a Real assault via genocide. The “Savoir-Faire of the Letter” 1 is de-knotted by the “fundamentally unreadable” 6 Real of the camps.

The passivity that was the primary strength of the Rabbinic ‘sinthome’—its channeling of ‘jouissance’ into text 1—is retroactively reframed as its catastrophic failure. The Imaginary identification with the “remnant” (‘objet a’) 1 is transformed from a symbolic cogito into a horrifying, literal reality in the ‘Sh’erit ha-Pletah’ (the “surviving remnant”).9

This de-knotting is confirmed in the immediate aftermath. The survivors in Displaced Persons (DP) camps are psychically and literally “homeless”.10 The Kielce Pogrom of July 1946 12 is the ultimate “impossible recognition” 6: a violent massacre of Jewish survivors after the war, by the local Polish population. This event “convinced many Polish Jews that they had no future in Poland after the Holocaust and spurred them to flee the country”.12 The old diasporic ‘sinthome’ of passive, textual co-existence was definitively broken; it now led only to more death.

2.3 The Collective Psychotic Void

The failure of the Rabbinic ‘sinthome’ signifies that the collective Jewish psyche is de-knotted. The rings of the Real, Symbolic, and Imaginary fall apart. This is the very definition of psychosis.1 The post-Shoah Jewish subject, exemplified by the survivor in the DP camp 9, exists in this psychotic void, facing the “unbearable dimension” 5 of the Real without a knot to structure it.

An “absolute necessity for survival” 1 arises, identical in its urgency to the one after 70 C.E., but now more total. A new fourth ring, a new ‘sinthome’, must be invented to re-knot the psyche and prevent its total dissolution.

The nature of this new knot is dictated by the trauma that broke the old one. The First Trauma (a Symbolic lack) was solved by a Symbolic sinthome (infinite text).1 The Second Trauma (a Real surplus) broke that Symbolic sinthome.6 Therefore, the new ‘sinthome’ cannot be merely Symbolic. It must be a ‘sinthome’ that engages the Real directly, a ‘savoir-faire’ that inverts the logic of the Rabbinic knot. Where the first ‘sinthome’ sublimated the Real into Text, the new ‘sinthome’ must concretize the Symbolic into the Real. This is the psychoanalytic function of Zionism, described as a “mad fantasy” 13 that takes the “text” (the Bible) and makes it land; it takes the “fantasy” (a Jewish State) and makes it fact.

Part III: Zionism as the New Collective Sinthome: The Second Knot

3.1 The Savoir-Faire of the State

Zionism is this new, invented, collective ‘sinthome’. It is, as Jacqueline Rose wrote, a “child of the psyche” that “brought itself into existence through the force of its own irrationality”.13 It is a collective “art” 1—a savoir-faire—that provides a new, durable knot for the post-Shoah Jewish psyche. This new ‘sinthome’ is not a “belief” (‘croyance’) but the tripartite practice of the State of Israel itself: a ‘savoir-faire’ of territory, language, and military power.1

This analysis requires a comparative, topological mapping, demonstrating how each function of the old Rabbinic ‘sinthome’ was de-knotted by the Shoah and replaced by a new one.

3.2 Central Analytic Table: A Comparative Topology of Collective Sinthomes

Lacanian Register	The Rabbinic Sinthome (Post-Temple Trauma, 70 C.E.)	The Zionist Sinthome (Post-Shoah Trauma, 1945)
The Symbolic (‘S’) (Language, Law, the “big Other”)	The “Savoir-Faire of the Letter” (Talmud/Midrash).1 Halakha (Rabbinic Law) as the divine Symbolic order.1	The “Savoir-Faire of the State.” Revival of Hebrew as a new, secular “signifying order”.14 Mamlachtiyut (State Law) replacing Halakha.16
The Imaginary (‘I’) (Ego, Identity, Image)	Identification with the “Remnant” (‘objet a’).1 The “Diasporic Jew” (intellectual, neurotic, passive).2	Identification with the “New Jew” (the “Sabra”).2 The “powerful eroticized counter-image” (muscular, active, landed).3
The Real (‘R’) (‘Jouissance’, Trauma, the Drive)	Halakha as a “template for ‘jouissance'”.1 Containing and domesticating the Real through meticulous ritual.	The Military and “Grief as Power”.18 Channeling the “unbearable ‘jouissance'” 19 of the Shoah into active repetition: territory, military power, and the “Masada complex”.20

3.3 Knotting the New Symbolic (The Law and the Letter)

The de-knotted psyche cannot subsist on the old Symbolic. The ‘savoir-faire’ of the Letter (Talmud) 1 is replaced by the ‘savoir-faire’ of the State.

• The New Language: The “revival of the Hebrew language” 15 is described as the “most amazing feat of Zionism”.22 From a Lacanian perspective, it is the creation of a new Symbolic order 14 ex nihilo. It takes a “dead” liturgical language 21 and transforms it into a living “signifying order… in language, which determine(s) the subject”.14 This new, modern, secular Hebrew becomes the “big Other” for the Israeli psyche.15
• The New Law: The law of the ‘sinthome’ necessarily shifts. The Rabbinic ‘sinthome’ was structured by Halakha 1, a divine law interpreted by rabbinic authority.23 The Zionist ‘sinthome’ is structured by secular state law.16 This is the “transition from halakha… from observance of the commandments to the religion of labor”.16 David Ben-Gurion’s ideology of Mamlachtiyut (statism) 24 functions as the new point de capiton (quilting point) 25, the Master-Signifier that “displacing and restructuring the previous order”.25 The Knesset, not the Yeshiva, becomes the locus of the Symbolic order.

3.4 Knotting the New Imaginary (The Ego and the Image)

The ‘sinthome’ must provide a new “mirror image” 1 for the collective ego. The Imaginary of the Rabbinic ‘sinthome’—the “neurotic, intellectual,” passive diasporic Jew 2—is now identified with the failure that led to the Shoah.

The Zionist ‘sinthome’ invents a “New Jew” 2 to replace this failed ‘imago’. This is the “Sabra,” epitomized in culture by the character Ari Ben Canaan in the film Exodus.3 This new ‘imago’ is defined by its direct opposition to the old one: it is “a powerful eroticized counter-image to the diasporic Jew”.3 Where the “Old Jew” was textual, the “New Jew” is landed. Where the old was passive, the new is active and muscular.26 Where the old was the “neurotic… Woody Allen,” the new is the “powerful… Paul Newman”.3 This “fantasized Sabra” is the “ultimate external validation of this fantasy” 3—the new, stable, and “healthy” 26 ego-ideal provided by the ‘sinthome’.

3.5 Knotting the New Real (The Management of Jouissance)

This is the most critical function of the new knot. The ‘sinthome’ must manage the “unbearable enjoyment” 1 of the Shoah—a trauma of the Real that is “impossible to be dialectized”.7

The Rabbinic ‘sinthome’ managed ‘jouissance’ via containment and sublimation (Halakha and text).1 The Zionist ‘sinthome’ manages ‘jouissance’ via active repetition and externalization. This new ‘savoir-faire’ is precisely what has been described as a “machine for the conversion of grief into power”.18 It “instrumentalized Jewish trauma” 18 and “weaponized” it.18

The “unbearable” ‘jouissance’ 19 of the Shoah is channeled into the military, the land, and the conflict. As Volkan’s theory of collective trauma suggests, the collective “behaves like a posttraumatic person,” with subsequent generations feeling a “duty to… transform the past passivity and helplessness into an active and assertive, often exaggerated, response to any danger”.20 This “disproportional aggressiveness/retaliation” 20 is the ‘jouissance’ of the ‘sinthome’. It is the “return from the real” 7 of the Shoah, but this time actively wielded as a “free and ruthless force” 27 rather than passively endured.

The “Masada complex” and the national “traumatic ethos” 20 are the names of this new ‘jouissance’—a “pain coupled with pleasure” 1 found in the perpetual re-staging of “existential fears” 20 to maintain the knot’s coherence.

Part IV: The “Enjoy-ment” of the Symptom: Mental Health and National Trauma in Israel

4.1 The Sinthome is Not a “Cure”

The Lacanian ‘sinthome’ must be rigorously differentiated from the Freudian symptom. The ‘sinthome’ is “not something to be ‘cured’ or ‘resolved'”.1 It is, rather, the “fixed manner in which subjects enjoy their unconscious” 1 and “maintain their sense of reality”.1

Therefore, the documented psychological cognates in modern Israel—its “mental health problems” —should not be analyzed as pathologies or failures of the Zionist ‘sinthome’. They are, speculatively, the very expression of its functioning. They are the “enjoy-ment” of the new symptom, the ‘savoir-faire’ by which the collective psyche lives with and manages the “hole in the Real” 5 of the Shoah.

4.2 Cognate 1: “Latent Vulnerability” as Psychic Structure

The most potent clinical evidence for this structure is found in studies on the intergenerational transmission of trauma. A 2024 study on Israeli descendants of Holocaust survivors (OHS) provides a perfect clinical illustration of the ‘sinthome’.28

• The Finding: Before the October 7, 2023 attack, probable PTSD rates for OHS were statistically identical to the control group (10.4% vs 11.5%). They were, in the words of the study, “typically well-functioning”.28 After the attack, the rates for the control group remained unchanged (11.5%), but the rates for OHS more than doubled to 20.9%.28
• Lacanian Analysis: This “latent vulnerability” 28 demonstrates the ‘sinthome’ at work. The Zionist ‘sinthome’ (the state, the military, the “New Jew” ‘imago’ 3) provides a powerful knot that allows the OHS to be “well-functioning” in daily life. This knot holds. However, the ‘sinthome’ does not resolve the Real trauma; it only knots it. When a new traumatic event occurs (Oct. 7), its intense Real ‘jouissance’ “reactivates” 20 the “latent” 28 un-symbolized Real of the Shoah. The ‘sinthome’ slips, the “past demons” 20 return, and the underlying de-knotting becomes manifest as a spike in psychopathology (PTSD).

4.3 Cognate 2: The “Traumatic Ethos” as Collective Jouissance

The Israeli psyche is defined by a “traumatic ethos” 20 and the institutional, professional category of “national trauma”.29 This is the collective savoir-faire of the ‘sinthome’.

• The Mechanism: The collective “behaves similarly to a posttraumatic person”.20 It perceives “a tragic but limited… hostile action” as a “grave collective threat,” which “invoke[s] past demons and bring[s] back existential fears”.20
• Lacanian Analysis: This is the ‘sinthome’ “enjoying its symptom.” It “collapses time” 20, confusing the present (a “limited threat”) with the un-symbolizable past (the Shoah) in order to re-encounter the traumatic Real. But it does so through the new knot: “transform[ing] the past passivity and helplessness into an active and assertive, often exaggerated, response”.20 The “disproportional aggressiveness” 20 is the ‘jouissance’ of the ‘sinthome’. This is the “machine for the conversion of grief into power” 18 in action. “Competitive victimhood” 30, the social psychological phenomenon of vying for the status of the greater victim, is a clear cognate of this, a social-level ‘jouissance’ derived from ensuring that the foundational trauma (the Shoah) remains the ultimate, un-symbolizable Real that guarantees the ‘sinthome’s’ necessity.

4.4 Cognate 3: The Anxiety / Resilience Paradox

Sociological studies reveal a paradox at the heart of the Israeli psyche: the society demonstrates simultaneously high rates of collective anxiety and trauma 31 and exceptionally high levels of “resilience”.33 After the October 7 attacks, for example, rates of probable PTSD jumped to 43.3% in young adults, yet “resilience” remained a primary metric.34

• Lacanian Analysis: This is not a contradiction; it is the very definition of the ‘sinthome’. “Resilience” is the strength of the knot. “Anxiety” is the jouissance of the Real that the knot is built to manage. The ‘sinthome’ is the “art” 1 of living with one’s anxiety (one’s Real). The high anxiety is the “enjoy-ment” of the “national trauma”.29 The high resilience is the “enjoy-ment” of the ‘sinthome’ itself (the “New Jew” ‘imago’ 3, the collective “conversion of grief into power” 18).

This is further supported by the finding that Holocaust survivors who immigrated to Israel “exhibited fewer pathological symptoms than those who immigrated to North America”.35 In North America, they faced a “conspiracy of silence” 35 and had to manage their de-knotted psyche individually. In Israel, their trauma was a “national event” 35; the collective Zionist sinthome was available to them as a new, functional knot.

4.5 Concluding Speculation: The Sinthome as “Iron Wall”

The Rabbinic ‘sinthome’, as theorized in the foundational document, was a flexible, “superabundant” 1, and textual knot. It was a ‘savoir-faire’ of the Letter that allowed the “Rabbinic psyche” to survive (and thrive) for nearly two millennia of exile precisely because it was disembodied and delocalized.1

The Shoah, an “impossible to be dialectized” 7 trauma of the Real, broke that textual knot.

The new Zionist ‘sinthome’ was forged in response, invented to knot the psyche against this unbearable Real. It is, therefore, not textual and flexible, but territorial, muscular, and rigid. It is a ‘savoir-faire’ of the “Iron Wall,” a “machine for the conversion of grief into power”.18

The “mental health problems” of modern Israel are the “psychic and affective features” 27 of this rigid knot. The “repetition-compulsion” of the conflict 27, the “psychic ‘state of siege'” 27, and the constant, anxious invocation of “existential fears” 20 are not, in this speculative framework, pathologies to be cured. They are the very ‘jouissance’ that fuels the ‘sinthome* and holds the collective psyche together after the psychotic void of the Shoah. It is the collective “enjoy-ment” of a symptom forged in the Real.

Works cited

1. The Knot of the Letter [Shraga Kreska].pdf
2. Negotiating National Identity in the Diaspora: The Jewish-Israeli Subject between Zionist Ideology and Diasporic Reality in – Brill, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9781848881174/BP000006.pdf
3. Identity politics on the Israeli screen 9780292747234 …, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://dokumen.pub/identity-politics-on-the-israeli-screen-9780292747234-9780292778207-9780292747241.html
4. The Impossible-to-write and the Unreadable | Cairn.info, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://shs.cairn.info/journal-research-in-psychoanalysis2-2015-1-page-43?lang=en
5. “Oneself as Another”: Identification and Mourning in Patrick Modiano’s Dora Bruder – New Prairie Press, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=\&httpsredir=1\&article=1656\&context=sttcl
6. Trauma and the Material Signifier | Lacanticles, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://lacanticles.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Trauma-and-the-Material-Signifier-pjb-copy-1.pdf
7. Mauas/reply to Said & Zizek – Lacan.com, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.lacan.com/mauasr2.htm
8. Trauma and the Material Signifier, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.101/11.2belau.txt
9. Aftermath of the Holocaust – Wikipedia, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftermath_of_the_Holocaust
10. The Aftermath of the Holocaust: Effects on Survivors, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-aftermath-of-the-holocaust
11. “Jewish Responses to the Holocaust: Dispossession, Restitution, and Reconstructing the Home”: An overview and reflections on a seminar held at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://ukrainianjewishencounter.org/en/jewish-responses-to-the-holocaust-dispossession-restitution-and-reconstructing-the-home-an-overview-and-reflections-on-a-seminar-held-at-the-united-states-holocaust-memorial-museum/
12. The Kielce Pogrom: A Blood Libel Massacre of Holocaust Survivors, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-kielce-pogrom-a-blood-libel-massacre-of-holocaust-survivors
13. The Political Unconscious – Jewish Currents, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://jewishcurrents.org/the-political-unconscious
14. The Imaginary and Symbolic of Jacques Lacan – DOCS@RWU, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044\&context=saahp_fp
15. Revival of the Hebrew language – Wikipedia, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revival_of_the_Hebrew_language
16. Israeli Law and Jewish Law in Israel: A Zero Sum Game? (Chapter 4) – Institutionalizing Rights and Religion, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/institutionalizing-rights-and-religion/israeli-law-and-jewish-law-in-israel-a-zero-sum-game/A67E7F9A285E467B0B7333F0F4D251A6
17. Paradigm Shift & Jewish Law – Ayin Press, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://ayinpress.org/paradigm-shift-judaism-and-jewish-law/
18. Israel Has Weaponized Trauma. Should We Talk About It? – Public …, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://publicseminar.org/2024/06/israel-weaponized-trauma/
19. Jacques Lacan – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lacan/
20. Collective Trauma and National Behavior in … – David Publishing, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/5757d02c8f9f9.pdf
21. The Evolution and Revival of the Hebrew Language, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.dynamiclanguage.com/the-evolution-and-revival-of-the-hebrew-language/
22. The Re-Creation of Hebrew:A “Dead Language” Lives Again – Commentary Magazine, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.commentary.org/articles/ralph-weiman/the-re-creation-of-hebrewa-dead-language-lives-again/
23. Orthodox Judaism and Psychoanalysis: Toward Dialogue and Reconciliation, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8434261_Orthodox_Judaism_and_Psychoanalysis_Toward_Dialogue_and_Reconciliation
24. A Psychoanalytic History of the Jews, by Avner Falk (Book Review) – ProQuest, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://search.proquest.com/openview/629b169701e9bbc820b7e359c4048eb5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar\&cbl=1816657
25. The “Real” in Resistance: Transgression of Law as Ethical Act, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://journals.law.harvard.edu/legalleft/wp-content/uploads/sites/81/2015/09/BEHI-Unbound.pdf
26. Psychoanalysis in Israel: New Beginnings, Old Trajectories – ResearchGate, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343184432_Psychoanalysis_in_Israel_New_Beginnings_Old_Trajectories
27. Full article: Intent to Harm: Settler Colonial Outposts in Psychoanalysis – Taylor and Francis, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19436149.2024.2348373
28. Intergenerational effects of the Holocaust following the October 7 …, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39637722/
29. Making up ‘national trauma, in Israel: From collective identity to …, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26502658/
30. Between Trauma and Perpetration: Psychoanalytical and Social Psychological Perspectives on Difficult Histories in the Israeli Context | Holocaust Studies in Haifa, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://haifaholocauststudies.wordpress.com/2017/05/25/between-trauma-and-perpetration-psychoanalytical-and-social-psychological-perspectives-on-difficult-histories-in-the-israeli-context-2/
31. Prof. Nevzat Tarhan: “A major collective trauma has occurred in Israeli society” – Üsküdar Üniversitesi, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://uskudar.edu.tr/en/new/prof-nevzat-tarhan-a-major-collective-trauma-has-occurred-in-israeli-society/62146
32. Study: Heavy social media use in Israel-Hamas war linked to higher anxiety, weaker resilience – Ynetnews, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/health_science/article/bkhxregole
33. Mental health and resiliency in Israeli society following 4 years of terrorism – ResearchGate, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286781353_Mental_health_and_resiliency_in_Israeli_society_following_4_years_of_terrorism
34. The Interplay of Personal and Collective Resilience and Mental Health During Prolonged Conflict: Insights From Young Adults in Israel – NIH, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12065528/
35. Transgenerational Transmission of Holocaust Trauma and Its … – MDPI, accessed on November 17, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/2/4/49