Metatron: Trajectories of an Angelic Figure from Jewish Mysticism to Comparative Religious Inquiry

GoogleNotebook LM Plus – A Deep Dive audio overview

I. Introduction: The Enigmatic Eminence of Metatron

Within the celestial hierarchies envisioned by Jewish mystical traditions, few figures command as much attention, intrigue, and scholarly debate as the angel Metatron. Emerging from relative obscurity in early rabbinic literature, Metatron ascends to a position of paramount importance in the esoteric speculations of Merkabah and Hekhalot mysticism, texts preoccupied with the visionary journey to the divine Throne. He is depicted as an angel of immense power and unique proximity to the Godhead, often bearing titles that suggest an almost vice-regal authority in the heavenly court. However, his precise origins, the etymology of his unusual name, and the full scope of his functions remain subjects of considerable discussion, complicated further by contested links to Gnostic systems and proposed influences on, or parallels within, early Christian thought.

The significance of Metatron extends beyond his specific roles within Jewish angelology. He serves as a crucial case study for understanding the development of concepts related to divine mediation, the nature of mystical experience, and the ways in which esoteric traditions evolved within Judaism, often navigating complex theological boundaries. The traditions surrounding Metatron, particularly his identification with the translated patriarch Enoch and the attribution of the provocative title “Lesser YHWH,” became focal points for ancient debates concerning divine unity and agency, most notably the rabbinic polemic against the heresy of “Two Powers in Heaven”.¹ Studying Metatron thus offers a window into the dynamic interplay between mystical speculation, theological boundary-setting, and the broader religious landscape of Late Antiquity.

This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the figure of Metatron, grounded in textual evidence and informed by contemporary scholarship. It will begin by tracing Metatron’s origins within Jewish tradition, examining his appearances in Talmudic and Midrashic sources and exploring the various hypotheses regarding his name and identity, including the pivotal connection with Enoch as detailed in texts like 3 Enoch.² Subsequently, the report will delve into Metatron’s multifaceted roles and attributes within Jewish mystical speculation, particularly the Merkabah/Hekhalot literature, where he functions as celestial scribe, heavenly high priest, mediator, and holder of potent titles like “Prince of the Divine Presence” and “Lesser YHWH”.⁴ Following this, the investigation will turn to potential connections and resonances between Metatron traditions and Gnostic thought, evaluating the nature and extent of any demonstrable influence.¹ The analysis will then consider the speculative pathways through which Metatron concepts might have intersected with or influenced early Christian angelology and Christology, paying close attention to the specific parallels frequently drawn between Metatron and Jesus Christ.⁶ Finally, the report will synthesize these findings, offering an overview of Metatron’s established significance in Jewish mysticism while critically assessing the more speculative claims regarding his influence on Gnosticism and mainstream Christianity, particularly concerning the comparisons with Jesus. The objective is to navigate the complex tapestry of established textual data and scholarly interpretation, distinguishing well-grounded conclusions from more conjectural hypotheses surrounding this enigmatic angelic figure.

II. The Genesis of Metatron in Jewish Tradition: Origins and Identity

The figure of Metatron emerges gradually within Jewish tradition, his presence marked by sparse but theologically charged appearances in rabbinic literature before achieving prominence in later mystical texts. His origins are shrouded in ambiguity, reflected in the uncertainty surrounding his name and the scholarly debates regarding his identity and geographical roots.

A. Early Rabbinic Footprints and Etymological Puzzles

Metatron is mentioned by name only a few times in the foundational texts of rabbinic Judaism, the Talmud and Midrash.¹ These references, though brief, are significant often because they occur within contexts defining theological boundaries or addressing potentially problematic beliefs. One notable instance appears in Tractate Hagigah (15a), recounting the mystical journey of the “Four Who Entered Pardes.” Here, the heretic Elisha ben Abuyah is said to have erred upon seeing Metatron seated – a privilege normally reserved for God alone – leading him to conclude, “Perhaps there are, God forbid, two powers in Heaven!”.¹ The Talmud explains Metatron’s sitting posture as permissible due to his function as the celestial scribe, recording the deeds of Israel.¹ To further counter Elisha’s heretical conclusion, the text relates that Metatron was punished with sixty fiery lashes to demonstrate his subordinate, angelic status.¹ Another key passage is found in Tractate Sanhedrin (38b), where Rabbi Idith refutes a sectarian (min) who suggests Metatron should be worshipped because his name is “like that of his Master,” referencing Exodus 23:21 (“My name is in him”). Rabbi Idith uses the same verse to argue that Metatron is merely an angel, God’s agent, and possesses no independent power, specifically lacking the authority to pardon transgressions.¹ Other Talmudic passages associate Metatron with the role of the “Prince of the World” (Sar ha-Olam), who, according to Yevamot 16b, uttered the words of Psalm 37:25, “I have been young; also I have been old” ¹, or suggest he might have temporarily taken God’s place instructing schoolchildren before the Temple’s destruction (Avodah Zarah 3b).¹ These early rabbinic sources thus introduce Metatron as an exceptionally high-ranking angel, closely associated with divine authority and knowledge, yet firmly situated within a framework emphasizing God’s absolute unity and sovereignty.

Compounding the figure’s mystique is the obscurity of the name “Metatron” itself. Unlike most angelic names in Jewish tradition (e.g., Michael, Gabriel, Raphael), “Metatron” lacks a clear Hebrew etymology and does not appear in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh).¹ This has led to numerous, often conflicting, scholarly hypotheses regarding its origin, with no definitive consensus emerging.⁹

Several potential etymologies have been proposed:

• Greek meta + thronos: Suggesting “one who serves behind the throne” or “one who occupies the throne next to the Throne of Glory”.¹ However, this derivation faces challenges: Metatron’s specific function as a servant of the throne appears relatively late in the development of the traditions, and the Greek word thronos itself is not attested in Talmudic literature.¹
• Latin metator: Meaning “one who measures out,” a guide, leader, messenger, or surveyor.¹ This etymology was suggested by medieval Jewish commentators like Eleazar of Worms and Nachmanides and revived by modern scholars like Hugo Odeberg.¹ Yakir Paz utilizes this derivation to support his theory of a Palestinian origin for Metatron, linking him to the angel guiding Israel in the Exodus (Ex. 23:20-21), conceived as a military guide (metator).¹⁰
• Persian Mithra: Proposed by Odeberg, linking Metatron to the ancient Persian deity associated with contracts, light, and mediation.¹
• Hebrew Roots: Some scholars attempt Hebrew derivations, such as from matara (מטרא), meaning “keeper of the watch” or “guardian” ⁹, or suggest connections to the divine name Shaddai through gematria (numerical equivalence of Hebrew letters), where both names total 314.⁶ Others link the name implicitly to YHWH via the interpretation of Exodus 23:21 (“My name is in him”) as referring to Metatron.⁶
• Intentional Obscurity: Gershom Scholem, a foundational scholar of Jewish mysticism, questioned whether a standard etymological explanation is even possible, suggesting the name might have been intended as a secret, perhaps arising from mystical meditation or glossolalia (speaking in tongues).⁹

The persistent ambiguity surrounding the name “Metatron” is itself significant. The lack of a clear Hebrew root, coupled with plausible derivations from Greek, Latin, and Persian, might indicate that the name, and perhaps the figure itself, was not a straightforward development within mainstream rabbinic tradition. It could point towards origins in more esoteric circles, possible assimilation of foreign concepts prevalent in the syncretistic Hellenistic or Persian environments, or a deliberate choice of a mysterious-sounding name befitting a unique and powerful celestial being. This etymological uncertainty mirrors the complexity of Metatron’s identity and the diverse traditions that converged upon him.

B. The Enochic Ascendancy: Apocalyptic Roots and Transformation in 3 Enoch

While early rabbinic sources offer glimpses of Metatron, a distinct and highly influential strand of tradition explicitly identifies him with the biblical patriarch Enoch, the seventh antediluvian figure who “walked with God” and “was not, for God took him” (Genesis 5:24). This identification finds its most detailed expression in the later mystical text known as 3 Enoch (also called Sefer Hekhalot, the Book of the Heavenly Palaces).

The figure of Enoch already possessed a rich history in Second Temple Jewish literature, particularly in the apocalyptic works collected under his name (1 Enoch, 2 Enoch) and related texts like the Book of Jubilees.¹ In these earlier traditions, Enoch is portrayed as a righteous man taken to heaven before death.¹³ He functions as a scribe, recording human deeds and heavenly secrets revealed to him by angels.¹⁴ He receives visions of God’s majesty, tours the cosmos, learns astronomical and calendrical lore, and sometimes possesses priestly characteristics, associated with incense offerings or heavenly sanctuaries.² Notably, in the Book of Parables (or Similitudes, a section of 1 Enoch), Enoch is seemingly identified with the pre-existent heavenly figure called the “Son of Man,” an eschatological judge.¹ While this specific identification in the Similitudes might represent a trajectory distinct from the one leading directly to the Rabbinic Metatron ¹⁵, it nonetheless demonstrates the tendency within Second Temple Judaism to elevate Enoch to a supreme, heavenly status.

The culmination of this elevation occurs in 3 Enoch, a text belonging to the Merkabah/Hekhalot mystical tradition, likely composed in Babylonia between the 5th and 9th centuries CE.² This work explicitly equates Metatron with the transformed Enoch.² The text, narrated from the perspective of the ascending mystic Rabbi Ishmael, features Metatron recounting his own story. He describes his human life as Enoch, son of Jared, his subsequent ascension to heaven, and his radical transformation into an angelic being of immense proportions and fiery substance: “flesh was turned to flame, his veins to fire, his eye-lashes to flashes of lightning, his eye-balls to flaming torches”.³ Following this metamorphosis, God bestows upon him numerous honors: a throne mirroring the Throne of Glory ³, knowledge of all divine secrets ², authority over all other angels, and the name Metatron.² Crucially, 3 Enoch states that God called him “the Lesser YHWH” in the presence of the heavenly host, explicitly linking this title to Exodus 23:21 (“my name is in him”).⁶

This dramatic transformation narrative in 3 Enoch is profoundly significant. It represents more than just an apotheosis or promotion; it depicts a fundamental ontological change, elevating a human being to the highest echelons of the angelic world, second only to God. This serves as a powerful archetype within the context of Hekhalot mysticism. The mystics (Yorde Merkabah, “Descenders to the Chariot”) who undertook perilous visionary ascents through fiery celestial palaces sought precisely such proximity to the divine.² Enoch-Metatron’s successful transformation provided the ultimate model and validation for their quest, demonstrating that the vast gulf between the human and the divine could, through exceptional righteousness and divine favor, be bridged, resulting in a near-divine, angelic existence.

Several scholars, notably Philip Alexander and Andrei Orlov, argue for a developmental continuity, viewing the Metatron figure in Hekhalot literature as the “climax” or logical progression of roles and attributes already present in earlier Enochic traditions.⁴ They point to the persistence of themes like Enoch’s scribal and priestly functions, which find echoes in Metatron’s duties.⁵ Texts like 2 Enoch (Slavonic Enoch), which describes Enoch’s angelic transformation and reception of secrets after ascending through the heavens ², are often seen as representing a crucial transitional stage, bridging the earlier apocalyptic materials and the later, fully developed mystical traditions centered on Metatron found in 3 Enoch and other Hekhalot works.²

C. Scholarly Controversies: Debating Metatron’s Origins

Despite the prominence of the Enoch-Metatron identification in 3 Enoch, scholarly consensus on Metatron’s ultimate origins remains elusive. Several competing theories exist, highlighting the figure’s complexity.

One major debate centers on whether Metatron originated solely from the Enochic stream or represents a convergence of multiple traditions. Some scholars propose that Metatron existed as an independent angelic figure, perhaps a primordial angel, before being identified with Enoch.¹ This view finds support in the fact that many rabbinic and Hekhalot sources mentioning Metatron do not explicitly link him to Enoch.⁴ Gershom Scholem famously distinguished between two primary streams of Metatron tradition: one identifying him with Enoch (prominent in extra-Talmudic and later mystical texts), and another depicting him as a primordial angel or identified with figures like Michael or Yahoel (more characteristic of Talmudic passages).⁴ Scholem noted the general reluctance within the Talmud to view Enoch favorably, particularly regarding his ascent ²², suggesting the Enoch-Metatron identification might have flourished in circles outside the mainstream rabbinic academies. Some early Kabbalists also posited two Metatrons, potentially distinguished by the spelling of the name (six letters vs. seven letters), representing the transformed Enoch versus a primordial Emanation linked to the Sefirot, specifically the Shekhinah.¹ Furthermore, scholars observe that Metatron inherited titles and functions reminiscent of other exalted figures in Jewish tradition, such as Michael, Yahoel, Melchizedek, and even Adam or Moses, suggesting an amalgamation process where Metatron absorbed characteristics from various mediatorial figures.¹

Another significant controversy concerns the geographical origins of the Metatron tradition. Yakir Paz has recently challenged the dominant view of a Babylonian origin linked to Enoch, arguing instead for a Palestinian Sitz im Leben.¹⁰ Paz connects Metatron primarily to the interpretation of the guiding angel in Exodus 23:20-21, suggesting the name derives from the Latin metator (military guide) and that this Palestinian tradition later spread to Babylonia. He posits that the identification with Enoch was a much later development, possibly occurring under Byzantine influence around 700 CE.¹⁰ Conversely, scholars like Peter Schäfer emphasize the prevalence of Metatron traditions in Babylonian sources – specifically the Babylonian Talmud and 3 Enoch.¹³ They argue that the distinctive features of Metatron, including the Enoch identification and the “Lesser YHWH” title, are best understood as products of the unique religious and cultural environment of Sasanian Babylonia (roughly 3rd to 7th centuries CE), possibly influenced by interactions with Zoroastrianism (e.g., parallels with the figure of Yima) and Christianity.¹³ Some evidence from Jewish Babylonian Aramaic incantation bowls found in Iraq, where Metatron sometimes appears in potentially negative or demonic contexts, further complicates the picture and casts doubt on a straightforward identification with the protective Exodus angel.¹⁰

The existence of these multiple, often conflicting, origin theories—Enoch versus primordial angel versus amalgam; Palestinian versus Babylonian roots—strongly indicates that Metatron was not a monolithic figure with a single, linear development. Instead, the name and concept likely functioned as a powerful attractor, drawing in and synthesizing diverse pre-existing traditions about principal angels, divine agents, heavenly scribes, translated patriarchs, and mediators. The figure appears to have developed differently in various Jewish communities and literary strata, perhaps reflecting underlying theological tensions, responses to external cultural influences (Hellenistic, Persian, Christian, Gnostic), or the specific visionary experiences and speculative needs of mystical groups.

The debate over when the identification of Metatron with Enoch became central—whether it was an ancient element or a later synthesis primarily solidified in Babylonian Hekhalot circles ¹⁰—carries significant weight for understanding the relationship between Second Temple apocalypticism and later Rabbinic/Hekhalot mysticism. If the identification is relatively late, as Paz and Schäfer argue, it suggests that Hekhalot mysticism involved a more active and creative synthesis of earlier traditions, rather than simply being a direct continuation of apocalyptic currents. The prominent Enoch-Metatron connection in 3 Enoch ³ would then represent a conscious, perhaps strategic, merging of the revered ancient patriarch with the figure of the supreme angel, possibly shaped by the specific intellectual and religious milieu of Sasanian Babylonia, including its interactions with Zoroastrian and Christian ideas.¹³ This perspective highlights the dynamism and adaptability of Jewish mystical traditions as they reshaped older materials to fit new frameworks and address contemporary concerns.

III. Metatron’s Roles within Jewish Mystical Speculation

Within the specialized literature of Jewish mysticism, particularly the Merkabah and Hekhalot texts dating from late antiquity to the early medieval period, Metatron assumes a central and multifaceted role. He is not merely one angel among many but often occupies a unique position as the highest of created beings, the chief attendant to the Deity, and a crucial figure for the mystics seeking to navigate the celestial realms.

A. The Angel of the Divine Chariot (Merkabah/Hekhalot Literature)

Merkabah (“Chariot”) mysticism, developing from speculations on the visionary experiences of prophets like Ezekiel and Isaiah ²³, focused on ecstatic ascents through multiple heavenly palaces or halls (Hekhalot) to behold the Divine Chariot and the Throne of Glory (Kavod).² This literature, including key texts like Hekhalot Rabbati, Maaseh Merkabah, and 3 Enoch (Sefer Hekhalot), forms the primary context for understanding Metatron’s most elaborate functions.²

Metatron’s prominence in these texts stems from his unparalleled proximity to the divine Throne. He is described as the “Prince over all princes” who “stands before him who is exalted above all gods”.⁵ His station is often depicted as being immediately before the divine Presence, sometimes serving behind the heavenly curtain (pargod) that veils God’s glory.⁵ Specific traditions locate a “great heavenly tabernacle of light” belonging to Metatron directly beneath the Throne of Glory.⁵ This proximity grants him access to divine secrets and positions him as the primary intermediary between the inaccessible Godhead and the rest of creation, including the ascending mystic.

Consequently, Metatron often functions as the guide and initiator for the visionary. In 3 Enoch, it is Metatron who takes Rabbi Ishmael on a tour of the heavens, explaining its wonders and revealing cosmological secrets.² He acts as the gatekeeper to higher levels of mystical knowledge and experience, embodying the ultimate achievement of the Merkabah adept’s journey.

B. A Constellation of Titles: Analyzing Metatron’s Functions

Metatron’s exalted status is reflected in a wide array of titles and functions attributed to him across various texts. These roles often build upon earlier traditions, particularly those associated with Enoch, while also incorporating functions reminiscent of other high angels like Michael or Yahoel.⁴

• Celestial Scribe: This is one of Metatron’s most consistent and fundamental roles, appearing in both Talmudic and Hekhalot sources.¹ He is tasked with recording the deeds of Israel ¹ or, more broadly, the deeds of all humankind.¹⁴ This function is explicitly used in the Talmud to justify his unique privilege of being seated in the heavenly court.¹ As the keeper of divine records, Metatron is intrinsically linked to judgment and the administration of cosmic order. This role clearly continues the scribal functions attributed to Enoch in earlier literature, where he recorded heavenly secrets and human actions.¹⁴ The scribal identity appears central to Metatron’s power, signifying his mastery over divine knowledge, secret lore, and the processes of judgment, making him an indispensable figure within a mystical tradition deeply concerned with wisdom and divine decrees.
• Mediator and Intercessor: Metatron frequently acts as a bridge between the transcendent God and the created world.² His mediation takes various forms: conveying divine knowledge and secrets to humanity ², executing divine judgment ⁴, representing or mediating God’s immediate presence and authority ⁴, and acting as an intercessor or advocate, particularly for Israel, in the celestial court.⁴ This consistent portrayal highlights a significant theological dynamic within these mystical circles. Faced with a conception of God as overwhelmingly majestic and remote, dwelling beyond multiple heavens guarded by fearsome angels ², a figure like Metatron becomes essential. He makes divine interaction conceivable and accessible, particularly for the mystic undertaking the perilous ascent, bridging the potentially paralyzing gap between the finite creature and the infinite Creator without diminishing divine transcendence.
• Heavenly High Priest and Choirmaster: Building on priestly associations found in earlier Enochic literature ⁵, Metatron assumes significant sacerdotal duties in Hekhalot texts. Philip Alexander has traced this continuity, noting that Enoch’s priestly role in Second Temple texts finds a later embodiment in Metatron’s functions.⁵ 3 Enoch 15B places Metatron in charge of a heavenly tabernacle situated beneath the Throne of Glory.⁵ His service involves preparing and arranging the angelic hosts, particularly the celestial Hayyot (“Living Creatures”), for their liturgical praise of God.⁵ A unique aspect of this role involves protecting these angelic singers from the overwhelming power of God’s voice; Metatron places a “deafening fire” or “fire of deafness” into their ears so they can perform their service without being harmed.⁵ Some passages suggest he also acts as the celestial choirmaster, leading the heavenly liturgy himself, perhaps by invoking the divine name.¹² The prominence of these liturgical roles likely reflects the historical context following the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in 70 CE.¹⁸ Metatron’s service in the celestial sanctuary provides a heavenly continuation and counterpart to the earthly Temple cult, transposing its essential functions into the mystical realm accessible through visionary practice. He embodies the ongoing priestly service before God, now located in the highest heavens.
• Prince Titles: Metatron bears several titles indicating his supreme authority within the angelic hierarchy and his role in divine administration. He is called “Prince of the World” (Sar ha-Olam) ¹, suggesting dominion over terrestrial affairs or the cosmic order. He is also frequently designated “Prince of the Divine Presence” (Sar ha-Panim) ², signifying his privilege of serving in God’s immediate presence, a role shared by only a few select angels. Another title is “Prince of the Torah” (Sar ha-Torah) ², indicating his mastery over divine wisdom and law, and perhaps his role in transmitting it. These titles collectively portray Metatron as God’s chief executive officer in the governance of the cosmos and the heavenly court.
• The “Youth” (Na’ar): This is one of Metatron’s most enigmatic titles.² Its application to a figure identified with the ancient patriarch Enoch, and possessing immense cosmic stature, seems paradoxical. Several interpretations exist. One common explanation, found within 3 Enoch itself, is that it signifies his status as a relative “latecomer” to the angelic realm, having originated as a human.² Another view suggests it denotes his role as a servant or attendant (na’ar can mean servant or attendant in Hebrew) to God, emphasizing his subordination despite his power.⁶ The title also appears in Hekhalot descriptions where the Na’ar emerges from beneath the Throne ⁵, and it has been linked by scholars to traditions concerning the Shi’ur Qomah (mystical measurement of the divine Body), where Metatron plays a significant role.¹¹ The paradoxical nature of the title likely carries symbolic weight, highlighting Metatron’s unique hybrid identity (human transformed into angel), his ultimate dependence on God, or perhaps functioning as a technical term within specific esoteric contexts whose precise meaning is now obscure.
• Other Titles: Further appellations include the “Measurer/Measure of the Lord” ⁴, possibly linked to the Shi’ur Qomah traditions or the Latin metator, and the “Guardian of Secrets” ¹¹, emphasizing his role as recipient and keeper of divine mysteries.

These diverse roles and titles paint a picture of Metatron as a figure of immense complexity and power, operating at the very center of the divine administration and mystical cosmology envisioned in Hekhalot literature.

Table 1: Key Attributes and Titles of Metatron

Title/Attribute	Description/Function	Key Source Texts/References
Lesser YHWH (YHWH HaQatan)	Holds a share in the divine name/authority; God’s chief representative; linked to Ex. 23:21 (“My name is in him”).	4
Celestial Scribe	Records deeds of Israel/humankind; keeper of divine records; justification for sitting in heaven.	1
Mediator / Intercessor	Bridges God and creation; mediates knowledge, judgment, presence; intercedes for Israel.	2
Heavenly High Priest	Serves in the celestial tabernacle; associated with heavenly liturgy; continues Enoch’s priestly role.	5
Choirmaster	Prepares/protects/directs angelic choirs (e.g., Hayyot) in praising God; places “fire of deafness” in their ears.	5
Prince of the World	Holds authority over the cosmos or earthly affairs.	1
Prince of the Divine Presence	Serves in God’s immediate presence; chief attendant angel.	2
Prince of the Torah	Master of divine Law and Wisdom; transmitter of Torah.	2
Youth (Na’ar)	Enigmatic title; interpreted as “latecomer” (human origin), “servant,” or linked to specific mystical contexts.	2
Measurer/Measure of the Lord	Possibly related to Shi’ur Qomah (divine dimensions) or Latin metator.	4
Guardian of Secrets	Knows and reveals/conceals divine mysteries and cosmic knowledge.	2

C. The “Lesser YHWH”: Theological Significance and Rabbinic Concerns

Among Metatron’s many titles, none is more theologically potent or controversial than “YHWH HaQatan” – the Lesser YHWH.⁴ This designation appears explicitly in 3 Enoch, where God himself bestows it upon the transformed Enoch.⁶ Its primary justification is derived from Exodus 23:21, where God speaks of an angel sent to guide Israel: “Beware of him and obey his voice… for My Name is in him”.¹ Mystical tradition interpreted this angel as Metatron and understood the phrase “My Name is in him” to mean that Metatron carried or embodied the divine Name (YHWH) itself, acting with God’s full authority.⁸ The numerical equivalence (gematria) between Metatron and Shaddai (Almighty), another divine name, was also cited in support of the idea that Metatron had a “Name like his Master”.⁶

This title represents the apex of Metatron’s exaltation. It positions him not merely as a high angel but as God’s primary agent, plenipotentiary representative, and perhaps even the embodiment of God’s immanent presence in the world.⁸ Such a bold conception likely arose from the theological need within these mystical circles to conceptualize how an utterly transcendent God could interact with the created world and manifest His power and presence through a chief representative. However, this very exaltation created significant theological tension. Granting an angel—even the highest angel, and one identified with a transformed human—a title incorporating the sacred Name and implying such divine agency bordered dangerously close to compromising the absolute unity of God, a cornerstone of Jewish faith.

This inherent tension explains why Metatron became a central figure in the rabbinic polemics against the heresy of “Two Powers in Heaven” (shtei rashuyot ba-shamayim).¹ This term referred to various beliefs deemed dualistic or binitarian, challenging God’s unique sovereignty. The story of Elisha ben Abuyah mistaking the seated Metatron for a second deity became a cautionary tale.¹ The Talmudic responses were designed to firmly reassert Metatron’s subordinate status. Emphasizing that he received sixty fiery lashes served to demonstrate his creaturely nature and susceptibility to punishment.¹ Explicitly denying him the power to forgive sins reinforced his role as an agent, not an independent authority.¹ Thus, the figure of Metatron, particularly associated with the title “Lesser YHWH,” functioned as a crucial boundary marker. The rabbinic discourse surrounding him served to define the limits of acceptable speculation about divine agency and mediation, pushing back against interpretations—whether arising from internal mystical tendencies or external influences like Gnosticism or Christianity—that could be perceived as threatening Jewish monotheism. By using the most highly exalted figure in their angelology as a test case, the rabbis could clearly demonstrate that even the “Lesser YHWH” remained fundamentally distinct from, and subordinate to, the one true God.

D. Echoes in Kabbalah (Brief Overview)

Metatron’s significance did not end with the Merkabah period; he continued to feature in later Jewish mystical traditions, most notably Kabbalah, albeit sometimes in transformed ways. The Zohar, the foundational text of medieval Kabbalah, mentions Metatron, often referring to him by the title “Youth” (Na’ar), which the Zohar interprets as meaning “servant”.⁶ The Zohar identifies this Metatron with the angel who led Israel through the wilderness (again referencing Exodus 23:21) and describes him as a heavenly priest.⁶

Kabbalistic thought further developed complex interpretations of Metatron. Some Kabbalists maintained the distinction noted earlier between two Metatrons: one being the transformed Enoch, the Prince of the Countenance dwelling within the divine palace, and the other being a Primordial Metatron, conceived as an emanation (sefirah) from the ultimate divine source (the Ein Sof or “Cause of Causes”). This Primordial Metatron was sometimes identified with the tenth and final sefirah, Malkhut (Kingdom), which is also associated with the earthly manifestation of the Divine Presence, the Shekhinah.¹ Later Kabbalists, such as the influential 17th-century Polish mystic Nathan Neta Shapira of Kraków, continued to engage deeply with the Enoch-Metatron cluster of traditions, integrating them into their complex symbolic systems.²⁵ While a full exploration of Metatron in Kabbalah is beyond the scope of this report, his enduring presence demonstrates the lasting impact of the earlier Merkabah traditions on the subsequent development of Jewish mysticism.

IV. Exploring Connections: Metatron, Gnosticism, and Hellenism

The figure of Metatron, with his exalted status and mediating functions, developed within the religiously pluralistic and intellectually dynamic environment of Late Antiquity. This context has led scholars to explore potential connections and parallels between Metatron traditions and other contemporary religious currents, particularly Gnosticism and broader Hellenistic thought.

A. Gnostic Resonances and Analogues

Gnosticism, a diverse set of religious movements flourishing in the early centuries CE, shared certain preoccupations with Jewish mystical traditions like Merkabah speculation. Both involved complex cosmologies featuring multiple heavens and angelic beings, narratives of visionary ascent to divine realms, and a strong emphasis on acquiring secret knowledge (gnosis) as key to salvation or enlightenment. Metatron himself is reportedly mentioned in some Gnostic texts, although specific references are not detailed in the provided materials.¹ Furthermore, texts like 3 Enoch, while considered to remain within the rabbinic framework, are sometimes described as having “Gnostic overtones”.²

Potential areas of conceptual overlap include the presence of highly exalted intermediary figures who bridge the gap between the ultimate, transcendent deity and the lower cosmos. While direct Gnostic analogues to Metatron are difficult to pinpoint definitively from the available sources, figures within various Gnostic systems—such as the Gnostic conception of Yahoel, aspects of Sophia (Wisdom), or even certain benevolent interpretations of the Demiurge (creator figure)—might share functional similarities with Metatron as principal agents, revealers of secrets, or guides through celestial spheres.

However, identifying such resonances does not automatically equate to direct influence. The parallels observed between Metatron traditions and Gnostic concepts likely point more broadly to a shared intellectual and religious milieu in Late Antiquity. Ideas concerning divine mediation, intricate cosmologies, the power of secret knowledge, and the possibility of human ascent circulated widely, influencing various groups differently. Jewish mysticism (specifically Merkabah/Hekhalot literature) and diverse Gnostic schools may have drawn upon and adapted common conceptual resources available in the Hellenistic world, potentially stemming from shared roots in Hellenistic Judaism or broader Near Eastern traditions. This could lead to analogous developments and structural similarities without necessitating direct borrowing or a simple cause-and-effect relationship. Influence, where it occurred, might have been complex, reciprocal, or filtered through multiple intermediaries.

B. Assessing Influence: Pathways and Debates

Determining the precise nature and direction of influence between Jewish mystical traditions concerning Metatron and Gnostic movements is inherently challenging. Potential pathways for interaction certainly existed: shared geographical regions like Egypt, Syria, and Mesopotamia were centers for both Jewish communities and various Gnostic schools. Texts and ideas could circulate, and individuals might have moved between or interacted across group boundaries. The overarching Hellenistic cultural environment facilitated a degree of syncretism and the exchange of philosophical and religious concepts.¹

Despite these possibilities, scholars generally urge caution regarding claims of direct, substantial Gnostic influence on the development of Metatron within Judaism, or vice versa. Foundational scholars like Gershom Scholem, while exploring phenomena he termed “Jewish Gnosticism,” often emphasized the distinct trajectories and theological frameworks of Jewish mysticism compared to mainline Gnostic systems.²³ As noted earlier, even 3 Enoch, with its perceived “Gnostic overtones,” is typically understood by scholars as remaining fundamentally within the bounds of rabbinic tradition.²

One area where interaction seems plausible, albeit perhaps in a polemical sense, is the rabbinic concern with “Two Powers in Heaven.” As discussed previously, Metatron became a key figure in these debates.¹ It is conceivable that this heightened concern was partly motivated by the perceived threat of Gnostic dualism, which often posited multiple divine or semi-divine principles. The rabbinic emphasis on Metatron’s createdness and subordination could thus be seen not only as regulating internal mystical speculation but also as implicitly rejecting Gnostic theological models that might appear similar. This suggests an awareness of, and conscious differentiation from, Gnostic ideas within the rabbinic circles grappling with the implications of highly exalted intermediary figures like Metatron.

V. Metatron’s Shadow in Christianity?: Influence and Christological Parallels

Just as scholars have explored links between Metatron and Gnosticism, considerable attention has been paid to potential connections and striking parallels between the figure of Metatron in Jewish mysticism and the figure of Jesus Christ in Christian theology. Investigating these connections requires careful navigation between identifying genuine historical intersections or shared conceptual roots and avoiding anachronistic equations or unsubstantiated claims of direct influence.

A. Tracing Potential Influence on Christian Thought

The possibility exists that early Christian conceptions of angels and Christology were influenced, at least indirectly, by Jewish traditions concerning highly exalted angelic figures like Metatron, Michael, or Yahoel.⁴ Early Christianity emerged from a Jewish context deeply immersed in Second Temple apocalyptic literature, which featured complex angelologies and speculations about divine agents and mediators.¹ Concepts prevalent in this milieu—such as the Son of Man figure (associated with Enoch in some texts ¹), personified Wisdom (Sophia) or the divine Word (Logos), and principal angels acting with divine authority—formed part of the conceptual toolkit available to the earliest followers of Jesus as they sought to understand his identity and significance.

Direct influence from the specific Metatron traditions found in later Hekhalot literature onto the formation of New Testament Christology is chronologically problematic and lacks clear textual evidence. The Hekhalot texts documenting Metatron’s most developed roles generally reached their final form centuries after the New Testament was written.² However, the ideas and traditions that culminated in the figure of Metatron—particularly those surrounding Enoch’s exaltation and the notion of a chief angelic mediator embodying God’s name and authority—were developing during the Second Temple period and may have circulated in forms that intersected with nascent Christian thought. Influence, if any, was likely indirect, perhaps mediated through shared interpretations of biblical texts (like Exodus 23:21 or Daniel 7), common apocalyptic motifs, or via Hellenistic Jewish converts who brought their existing angelological frameworks into early Christian communities. It is also possible that some concepts flowed through Gnostic channels that interacted with both Jewish mystical circles and early Christian groups, although this remains speculative.

B. Comparing Figures: Analyzing Parallels Drawn Between Metatron and Jesus

Regardless of direct influence, scholars and theologians have long noted functional and titular parallels between Metatron, as depicted primarily in Jewish mystical texts, and Jesus Christ, as understood in Christian theology.⁶ Examining these parallels requires careful attention to the distinct contexts and theological frameworks of each tradition. Key points of comparison include:

• Divine Agency and Name: Metatron’s title “Lesser YHWH,” derived from the idea that God’s Name (authority, presence) is “in him” (Exodus 23:21) ⁶, resonates with Christian conceptions of Jesus as the Logos (Word) made flesh (John 1), the Son in whom the fullness of the Father dwells (Colossians 1:19, 2:9), and the one who carries and reveals the Divine Name.⁸ Both figures are portrayed as the supreme agent of the transcendent God.
• Mediation: Metatron functions as a key mediator between God and humanity, conveying knowledge, judgment, and presence.² This parallels the central role of Jesus in Christian theology as the unique Mediator between God and humankind (1 Timothy 2:5), the one through whom God interacts with the world and through whom humanity approaches God.
• Exaltation and Enthronement: Metatron’s transformation and enthronement in heaven, often depicted as occupying a throne next to God’s Throne ³, finds an analogue in the Christian narrative of Christ’s ascension, exaltation, and seating at the right hand of God the Father (e.g., Acts 2:33, Hebrews 1:3).
• Pre-existence Concepts: While the identification of Metatron with the human Enoch complicates notions of pre-existence, the idea of a Primordial Metatron existing before creation, possibly linked to the Sefirot ¹, parallels the Christian doctrine of Christ’s eternal pre-existence as the divine Logos before his incarnation (John 1:1-3).
• Scribal/Revelatory/Judgment Roles: Metatron’s role as the celestial scribe, keeper of secrets, and agent of divine judgment ¹ has functional similarities to Christ’s role as the ultimate Revealer of God’s truth, the Word through whom God speaks, and the appointed Judge of all humankind (e.g., John 5:22, Acts 17:31).

These parallels are striking, but understanding their significance requires acknowledging the profound differences in how each figure is ultimately conceived within its respective tradition.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis: Metatron and Jesus

Point of Comparison	Metatron Context (Jewish Mysticism)	Jesus Context (Christian Theology)	Scholarly Notes/Caveats
Divine Agency/Name	“Lesser YHWH” (YHWH HaQatan); God’s name “in him” (Ex. 23:21); chief agent/representative; shares name via Gematria (Shaddai). 6	Logos/Word made flesh (John 1); Son of God; fullness of God dwells in him (Col. 1:19); unique bearer of divine authority. 8	Both act as supreme divine agents, but Metatron is explicitly subordinate/created (punished 1), while Christ is confessed as co-equal/co-eternal God in orthodox Trinitarianism. Shared concept of agency likely stems from Second Temple ideas.
Mediation Role	Mediator of knowledge, judgment, presence; intercessor for Israel; guide for mystics. 2	Unique Mediator between God and humanity (1 Tim 2:5); High Priest (Hebrews); way to the Father (John 14:6).	Both bridge divine and human realms. Metatron is the highest angelic mediator; Christ is the unique God-man Mediator. Functional similarity, ontological difference.
Exaltation/Enthronement	Transformed human (Enoch) elevated to angelic status; enthroned beside/near God’s Throne. 3	Ascended into heaven; seated at the right hand of God the Father; given all authority. (Acts 2:33, Heb 1:3)	Both depict supreme heavenly exaltation. Metatron’s enthronement is derived/granted; Christ’s is inherent to his divine nature as Son. Shared motif of heavenly enthronement common in apocalyptic thought.
Pre-existence Concepts	Primarily identified with transformed Enoch (not pre-existent). Idea of a “Primordial Metatron” linked to Sefirot exists in some Kabbalistic thought. 1	Eternal pre-existence as the divine Logos/Son before incarnation (John 1:1-3, Phil 2:5-7).	Central doctrine in Christianity; more complex/contested/later development for Metatron. The Enoch-Metatron identity dominates Hekhalot texts.
Scribal/Revelatory/Judgment Functions	Celestial Scribe; Guardian/Revealer of secrets; involved in divine judgment. 1	Revealer of God (Logos); embodiment of Truth; appointed final Judge of all. (John 1:18, John 5:22)	Functional parallels in revelation and judgment. Metatron records/executes based on divine decree; Christ reveals/judges with inherent divine authority.

C. Scholarly Views on the Metatron-Jesus Relationship

The prevailing scholarly consensus does not posit a direct dependence of New Testament Christology on the specific figure of Metatron as developed in later Hekhalot literature. Instead, the observed parallels are generally attributed to both traditions independently drawing upon and developing a common pool of concepts and figures available within the diverse landscape of Second Temple Judaism.¹ Ideas about exalted patriarchs like Enoch, heavenly figures like the Son of Man, personified divine attributes like Wisdom (Sophia) or the Word (Logos), and beliefs in principal agent angels who act with God’s authority were part of the religious currency of the era. Early Christians utilized these existing concepts to articulate their understanding of Jesus’ unique identity and mission, while Jewish mystics, particularly in the Merkabah tradition, synthesized and elaborated upon similar ideas to develop the figure of Metatron as the supreme intermediary. Scholars like Guy Stroumsa have explored these shared roots and analogous developments in divine “form(s)” or mediators.⁶ Therefore, the similarities between Metatron and Jesus likely reflect a shared heritage and parallel responses to common theological questions about divine immanence and agency, rather than a direct line of borrowing between rabbinic mysticism and early Christianity.

Some scholars suggest that the rabbinic discussions surrounding Metatron, especially within the “Two Powers” polemics, might contain an implicit anti-Christian dimension.¹³ By emphasizing Metatron’s createdness, subordination, and liability to punishment ¹, rabbinic authorities could simultaneously regulate internal Jewish speculation and refute Christian claims about Jesus’ divinity. In this view, Metatron—the highest conceivable intermediary within their own framework—served as a negative example, demonstrating that even a figure called “Lesser YHWH” was unequivocally not God, thereby implicitly countering the core assertions of Christian Christology.¹³

It is also important to distinguish these historical and theological analyses from more recent, often syncretistic attempts to directly equate Metatron and Jesus. Some modern movements, particularly within certain Messianic Jewish, Hebrew Roots, or esoteric Kabbalistic circles, explicitly identify “Yeshua” (Jesus) with Metatron.⁸ These interpretations typically read Christian theological claims back onto Jewish mystical figures, overlooking the distinct historical trajectories, theological contexts, and fundamental differences in the nature and significance attributed to Metatron (an angel/transformed human) within Judaism and Jesus (the incarnate God/Son of God) within Christianity. Such modern equations represent a form of contemporary theological syncretism rather than reflecting the historical understanding within either mainstream tradition.

VI. Synthesis and Conclusion

The figure of Metatron stands as a testament to the dynamism and speculative depth of Jewish mystical tradition. Emerging from enigmatic references in early rabbinic literature, he achieves an unparalleled status within the Merkabah and Hekhalot texts, embodying the aspirations and theological complexities of those circles preoccupied with the direct experience of the divine.

A. Recapitulation of Metatron in Jewish Tradition:

The investigation confirms Metatron’s complex origins, with scholarly debate persisting over the etymology of his name and whether his identity stems primarily from the exalted patriarch Enoch, a primordial angelic being, or an amalgamation of various mediatorial figures. The identification with Enoch, most explicitly detailed in 3 Enoch, provides a powerful narrative of human potential for transformation and angelic elevation, serving as an archetype for the Hekhalot mystic. Within this mystical literature, Metatron functions in multiple crucial capacities: as the celestial scribe, recording deeds and guarding secrets; as the heavenly high priest and choirmaster, overseeing the celestial liturgy; as the primary mediator, bridging the gap between the transcendent God and creation; and as the supreme angelic prince, governing the heavenly hosts. His status culminates in the title “Lesser YHWH,” signifying his role as God’s chief agent, bearing divine authority – a designation that simultaneously marks the zenith of his exaltation and the focal point of rabbinic concern regarding the heresy of “Two Powers in Heaven.” This theological tension underscores Metatron’s role as a figure through whom the boundaries of acceptable monotheistic speculation were negotiated.

B. Evaluating External Connections:

The exploration of potential links to Gnosticism and Christianity reveals a landscape of shared concepts and analogous structures rather than clear evidence of direct, substantial influence in either direction. Metatron traditions and Gnostic systems both feature intermediary beings, complex cosmologies, and ascent narratives, likely reflecting their common origins within the broader intellectual and religious milieu of Late Antiquity, where such ideas circulated widely. Similarly, while potential indirect pathways for influence on early Christian angelology exist, the specific Metatron figure of Hekhalot literature appears too late to have directly shaped New Testament Christology. Claims of direct influence remain largely speculative and less compelling than understanding Metatron’s development within its internal Jewish context.

C. Final Assessment of Metatron-Jesus Comparisons:

The striking parallels drawn between Metatron and Jesus – particularly regarding divine agency, mediation, exaltation, and revelatory functions – are best understood as resulting from both traditions independently drawing upon and developing shared theological resources inherited from Second Temple Judaism. Concepts like the Son of Man, the Logos/Wisdom, and principal agent angels provided a common conceptual background. While the functional analogies are significant and point to shared historical roots and similar theological problems (reconciling divine transcendence and immanence), equating the two figures ignores fundamental distinctions. Metatron, even at his most exalted, remains an angel or transformed human within Jewish mystical thought, explicitly subordinated to the one God. Jesus, in mainstream Christian doctrine, is confessed as the eternally pre-existent Son of God, incarnate and co-equal with the Father within the Trinity. The rabbinic polemics surrounding Metatron may, in fact, highlight this difference, implicitly using the highest Jewish intermediary to counter Christian claims. Modern attempts to equate the two represent later syncretic reinterpretations detached from the historical and theological realities of either tradition.

D. Concluding Remarks:

Metatron remains a figure of enduring fascination, offering invaluable insights into the history of Jewish mysticism, the development of angelology, and the complex negotiation of theological concepts like mediation and divine unity. His multifaceted roles, controversial status, and the debates surrounding his origins and influence reflect the rich tapestry of religious thought in Late Antiquity. Studying Metatron compels a nuanced approach, acknowledging his established importance within specific Jewish esoteric traditions while critically evaluating claims of broader influence and parallels. He serves as a powerful reminder of the creative ways religious traditions grapple with the profound mystery of the relationship between the divine and the created world, generating figures that both illuminate and challenge the boundaries of theological imagination.

Works cited

1. Metatron – Wikipedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metatron
2. SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON ENOCH/METATRON IN THE JEWISH MYSTICAL TRADITION by Felicia Waldman University of Bucharest – Brill, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004194199/Bej.9789004187733.i-284_010.xml
3. 3 Enoch – Wikipedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_Enoch
4. Roles and Titles of Enoch-Metatron in Sefer Hekhalot and Other Materials, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://jewishrootsofchristianmysticism.com/roles-and-titles-of-enoch-metatron-in-sefer-hekhalot-and-other-materials/
5. Priestly and Liturgical Roles of Metatron Andrei Orlov – Marquette University, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/metatronpriest.html
6. Angels | The Psychic Shack, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://thepsychicshack.wordpress.com/category/angels/
7. In reference to the Trinity, what is a ‘person’s? : r/AskAChristian – Reddit, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAChristian/comments/116lh52/in_reference_to_the_trinity_what_is_a_persons/
8. The Messianic Believer’s First Response Handbook | Henk Rijstenberg, accessed on April 19, 2025, http://www.henkrijstenberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/HEBREW-ROOTS-MESSIANIC-HANDBOOK-TBV-JODEN.pdf
9. The Enoch-Metatron Tradition – ShulCloud, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://images.shulcloud.com/609/uploads/class_files/Pardes/MetatronEtymology.pdf
10. The Mysterious Name of Metatron: Judaïsme Ancien – Ancient Judaism: Vol 11, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/10.1484/J.JAAJ.5.141336?mobileUi=0
11. Roles and Titles of Enoch-Metatron in Sefer Hekhalot and Other Materials – Marquette University, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/Chapter%203.pdf
12. Andrei Orlov Celestial Choirmaster – Marquette University, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/regent.html
13. Enoch’s Walk with God Ends Badly in Babylonia – TheGemara.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://thegemara.com/print/?article=enochs-walk-with-god-ends-badly-in-babylonia
14. Enoch Mediatorial Traditions: An Overview (Part 2) – Hans Moscicke – WordPress.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://hansmoscicke.wordpress.com/2017/09/25/enoch-mediatorial-tradition-a-brief-overview-part-2/
15. Roles and Titles of the Seventh Antediluvian Hero in the Book of the Similitudes: A Departure from the Traditional Pattern? – Marquette University, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/camaldoli.html
16. Celestial Choirmaster: The Liturgical Role of Enoch-Metatron in 2 Enoch and the Merkabah Tradition – Jewish Roots of Christian Mysticism, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://jewishrootsofchristianmysticism.com/celestial-choirmaster-the-liturgical-role-of-enoch-metatron-in-2-enoch-and-the-merkabah-tradition/
17. Enoch in the Old Testament and Beyond | Religious Studies Center, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/creation-sinai/enoch-old-testament-beyond
18. Merkabah mysticism – Wikipedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkabah_mysticism
19. Yeridah la-Merkavah: Typology of Ecstasy and Enthronement in Ancient Jewish Mysticism, accessed on April 19, 2025, http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~kazhdan/Shneider/EarlyMyst2008/Wolfson,%20Elliot%20R.%20Yeridah%20la-Merkavah–%20Typology%20of%20Ecstasy%20and%20Enthronement%20in%20Ancient%20Jewish%20Mysticism%20ocr%201.pdf
20. View of Review of Andrei A. Orlov, The Enoch-Metatron Tradition | The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://jhsonline.org/index.php/jhs/article/view/5700/4753
21. TITLES OF ENOCH-METATRON IN 2 (SLAVONIC) ENOCH1 – Brill, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://brill.com/view/journals/scri/3/1/article-p397_19.pdf
22. Metatron as the Mediator of the Divine Name – Marquette University, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/metatron99.html
23. Notes on the Study of Merkabah Mysticism and Hekhalot Literature in English, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://blog.umamaya.com/wp-content/gold/Kabbalah/Notes_on_the_Study_of_Merkabah_Mysticism.pdf
24. Is Metatron and enoch the same figure? : r/spirituality – Reddit, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/spirituality/comments/1bghtv8/is_metatron_and_enoch_the_same_figure/
25. The Enoch-Metatron Tradition in the Kabbalah of Nathan Neta Shapira of Kraków (1585-1633) – UCL Discovery, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1404057/3/PhD_final_19_08_2013.pdf
26. Enoch Walked with God, and He Was Not – BYU ScholarsArchive, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=23&article=1021&context=ifb&type=additional
27. Kabbalah Secrets | PDF – Scribd, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/732154535/Kabbalah-Secrets

---

Data // Google Gemini 2,5 Deep Research Curated by FoundationP – Images Microsoft Designer – Audio Notebook LM Plus